000 | 01658nam a2200265 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c19910 _d19910 |
||
001 | BD-DhNSU-19910 | ||
003 | BD-DhNSU | ||
005 | 20201028154721.0 | ||
008 | 190403s1961 nyu||||g |||| 001 0|eng d | ||
020 | _a9780415058964 | ||
040 |
_aDLC _cDLC _dBD-DhNSU |
||
041 | _aeng | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aPA3131 _b.K58 1961 |
100 | 1 |
_aKitto, H. D. F. _912548 |
|
245 | 0 | 0 |
_aGreek tragedy : _ba literary study / _cH. D. F. Kitto |
250 | _a3rd ed. | ||
260 |
_aNew York : _bRoutledge, _cc1961. |
||
300 |
_axi, 203 p. ; _c21 cm. |
||
520 | _aWhy did Aeschylus characterize differently from Sophocles? Why did Sophocles introduce the third actor? Why did Euripides not make better plots? So asks H.D.F Kitto in his acclaimed study of Greek tragedy, available for the first time in Routledge Classics. Kitto argues that in spite of dealing with big moral and intellectual questions, the Greek dramatist is above all an artist and the key to understanding classical Greek drama is to try and understand the tragic conception of each play. In Kitto’s words ‘We shall ask what the dramatist is striving to say, not what in fact he does say about this or that.’ Through a brilliant analysis of Aeschylus’s ‘Oresteia’, the plays of Sophocles including ‘Antigone’ and ‘Oedipus Tyrannus’; and Euripides’s ‘Medea’ and ‘Hecuba’, Kitto skilfully conveys the enduring artistic and literary brilliance of the Greek dramatists. | ||
526 | 0 | _aLanguage and Literature | |
590 | _aMd. Abdul Hakim | ||
650 | 0 |
_aGreek drama (Tragedy) _xHistory and criticism _912549 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aMythology, Greek, in literature _912551 |
|
942 |
_2lcc _cBK |